|
|
|
Technology Assessment & Research (TA&R) Project Categories |
|
|

Remote
Sensing is a critical element for an effective
response to marine oil spills. Timely response to an oil spill requires
rapid reconnaissance of the spill site to determine its exact location,
extent of oil contamination (particularly the thickest portion of the slick)
and verifying predictions of the movement and fate of oil slicks at sea.
This is necessary to effectively direct spill countermeasures such as
mechanical containment and recovery, dispersant application and in situ
burning, the timely protection of sites along threatened coastlines and the
preparation of resources for shoreline clean-up. Remote sensing is useful in
several modes of oil spill control, including large area surveillance, site
specific monitoring and tactical assistance in emergencies. It is able to
provide essential information to enhance strategic and tactical
decision-making, decreasing response costs by facilitating rapid oil
recovery and ultimately minimizing impacts. For ocean spills, remote sensing
data can provide information on the rate and direction of oil movement
through multi-temporal imaging and input to drift prediction modeling.
Observation can be undertaken visually or by use of remote sensing systems.
In remote sensing, a sensor other than human vision or conventional
photography is used to detect or map oil spills. Remote sensing of oil on
land is particularly limited.
Visual
observations of spilled oil from the air,
along with still and video photography, are the simplest and most common
method of determining the location and extent (scale) of an oil spill.
Remote sensing of spilled oil can be undertaken by helicopter, particularly
over near-shore waters where their flexibility is an advantage along
intricate coastline with cliffs, coves and islands. For open ocean spills,
there is less need for rapid changes in flying speed, direction and
altitude, in these instances the use of low altitude, fixed-wing aircraft
have proven to be the most effective tactical method for obtaining
information about spills and assisting in spill response. For spill response
efforts to be focused on the most significant areas of the spill, it is
important to note the relative and heaviest concentrations of oil. GPS and
other aircraft positioning systems allow pinpointing the oil's location.
Photography, particularly digital photography, is also a useful recording
tool and allows others to view the situation on return to base. Many devices
employing the visible spectrum, including the conventional video camera, are
available at a reasonable cost. Dedicated remote sensing aircraft often have
built-in downward looking cameras linked with a GPS to assign accurate
geographic co-ordinates.
|

|
Part of an oil slick of several kilometers
follows the stricken Bahamas-flagged
Prestige oil tanker, November 20,
2004. |
Photo by European Space Agency
|
Practical
oil spill detection is still performed by visual observation, which is
limited to favorable sea and atmospheric conditions and is inoperable in
rain, fog, or darkness. Visual observations are restricted to documentation
of the spill because there is no mechanism for positive oil detection. Very
thin oil sheens are also difficult to detect especially in misty or other
conditions that limit vision. Oil can be difficult to see in high seas and
among debris or weeds where it can blend in to dark backgrounds such as
water, soil, or shorelines. Many naturally occurring substances or phenomena
can be mistaken for spilled oil. These include sun glint, wind shadows and
wind sheens, biogenic or natural oils from fish and plants, glacial flour
(finely, ground mineral material usually from glaciers), and oceanic or
riverine fronts where two different bodies of water meet. The usefulness of
visual observations is limited, however, it is an economical way to document
spills and provide baseline data on the extent and movement of the spilled
oil.
An estimate of the quantity of oil observed at sea is
crucial. Observers are generally able to distinguish between sheen and
thicker patches of oil. However gauging the oil thickness and coverage is
rarely easy and is made more difficult if the sea is rough. All such
estimates should be viewed with considerable caution. The table below gives
some guidance. Most difficult to assess are water-in-oil emulsions and
viscous oils like heavy crude and fuel oil, which can vary in thickness from
millimeters to several centimeters.
|
Oil Type |
Appearance |
Approximate
Thickness |
Approximate
Volume (m³/km²) |
| Oil Sheen |
Silver |
>0.0001 mm |
0.1 |
| Oil Sheen |
Iridescent
(rainbow) |
>0.0003 mm |
0.3
|
| Crude and
Fuel Oil |
Brown to
Black |
>0.1 mm |
100 |
| Water-in-oil
Emulsions |
Brown/Orange |
>1 mm |
1000 |
Remote Sensing Equipment mounted in aircraft is
increasingly being used to monitor, detect and identify sources of illegal
marine discharges and to monitor accidental oil spills. Remote sensing
devices used include the use of infra-red (IR) video and photography from
airborne platforms, thermal infrared imaging, airborne laser fluourosensors,
airborne and satellite optical sensors, as well as airborne and satellite
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). SAR sensors have an advantage over optical
sensors in that they can provide data under poor weather conditions and
during darkness. Remote sensors work by detecting properties of the sea
surface: color, reflectance, temperature or roughness. Oil can be detected
on the water surface when it modifies one or more of these properties.
Cameras relying on visible light are widely used, and may be supplemented by
airborne sensors which detect oil outside the visible spectrum and are thus
able to provide additional information about the oil. The most commonly
employed combinations of sensors include Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR)
and downward-looking thermal IR and ultra-violet (UV) detectors or imaging
systems. All sensors must be calibrated and require highly trained personnel
to operate them and interpret the results.
Satellite-Based Remote Sensing
systems can also detect oil on water. The sensors on board are either
optical, detecting in the visible and near IR regions of the spectrum, or
use radar. Optical observation of spilled oil by satellite requires clear
skies, thereby severely limiting the usefulness of such systems. SAR is not
restricted by the presence of cloud and is a more useful tool. However, with
radar imagery, it is often difficult to be certain that an anomalous feature
on a satellite image is caused by the presence of oil. Consequently, radar
imagery from SAR requires expert interpretation by suitably trained
personnel to avoid other features being mistaken for oil spills. To date,
operational use of satellite imagery for oil spill response has not been
possible because limited spatial resolution, slow revisit times, and often
long delays in receipt of processed image. However, satellite imagery can be
used later to complement aerial observations and provide a wider picture of
the extent of pollution.
|

|
A satellite image of the
same November 20, 2004 event. This SAR image shows tanker, Prestige, 100
km off the Spanish coast. |
Photo by European Space Agency
|
The present inability to reliably detect and map oil
trapped in, under, on, or among ice is a critical deficiency, affecting all
aspects of response to oil spills in ice. Although there is still no
practical operational system to
remotely detect or map
oil-in-ice, there are several
technology areas where further research into ground-based remote sensing
could yield major benefits. Examples include ground-penetrating radar,
optical beams for river spills and vapor detection (e.g. gas-sniffer
systems) for oil trapped in and under ice.
A critical gap in responding to oil spills is the
present lack of capability to measure and accurately map the thickness of
spilled oil on the water. There are no operational sensors, currently
available, that provide absolute measurement of
oil slick thickness
on the surface of the water. A thickness sensor would allow spill
countermeasures to be effectively directed to the thickest portions
of the
oil slick. Some IR sensors have the ability to measure relative oil
thickness. Thick oil appears hotter than the surrounding water during
daytime. Composite images of an oil slick in both UV and IR sensors have
shown able to show relative thickness in various areas with the thicker
portions mapped in IR and the thin portions mapped in UV.

Improve the operational capability of existing
remote sensing equipment and techniques to respond to oil spills in the
marine environment.
Work cooperatively with U.S. state and federal
agencies and foreign countries to develop new operational remote sensing
capabilities. This includes sensors to detect, locate and map oil spill
trapped in, under and among ice, submerged or neutrally buoyant oils,
and the ability to determine the thickness of an oil spill.

Work cooperatively with U.S. state and federal
agencies and foreign countries to expand oil spill airborne remote
sensing capabilities to detect, define and track oil spills in the
marine environment.
Continue work to develop operational sensors
that are able to detect, locate and map the extent of an oil spill
trapped in, under and among ice.
Evaluate proven open water sensors in a broken
ice field (e.g. Infra-red, Laser Fluorosensor, high resolution Synthetic
Aperture Radar (SAR).
Work cooperatively with U.S. state and federal
agencies and foreign countries to continue development of an operational
airborne oil slick thickness sensor.
Evaluate sensors that have the potential to
detect, locate and map the presence of submerged or neutrally buoyant
oils.
Work cooperatively with U.S. state and federal
agencies and foreign countries to improve oil spill tracking buoys.
Take advantage of planned full-scale field
trials to validate and prove response technologies and strategies
developed in laboratory and meso-scale experiments and to develop
operational guidelines for particular response technologies. Full-scale
field trials must include ground-truthing of data.
|
Remote Sensing Projects |
|
136 |
Shipboard
Navigational Radar as an Oil Spill Tracking Tool |
|
154 |
Development of
Improved Oil Spill Remote Sensing Techniques |
|
157 |
Development of
an Airborne Oil Spill Thickness Sensor |
|
161 |
Development of
a New Generation Laser Fluorosensor |
|
240 |
Development of
a Frequency Scanning Radiometer to Measure Oil Slick Thickness, Phase
II |
|
311 |
Oil Spill
Containment, Remote Sensing, and Tracking from Deep Water Blowouts
Status of Existing and Emerging Technologies |
|
348 |
Detection and
Tracking of Oil Under Ice |
|
355 |
Using
Satellite Radar Imagery to Detect Leaking Abandoned Wells on the U.S.
OCS |
|
517 |
New and
Innovative Equipment and Technologies for the Remote Sensing and
Surveillance of Oil in and Under Ice |
|
544 |
Real-time
Detection of Oil Slick Thickness Patterns with a Portable
Multispectral Sensor |
|
547 |
Developing New
and Innovative Equipment and Technologies for the Remote Sensing and
Surveillance of Oil in and Under Ice - Phase 2 |
|
569 |
Svalbard, Norway Experimental Oil Spill To Study Spill
Detection and Oil Behavior in Ice |
|
588 |
Detection of
Oil on and Under Ice - Phase 3 |
|
594 |
Development of
a Portable Multispectral Aerial Sensor for Real-time Oil Spill
Thickness Mapping in Coastal and Offshore Waters |
For more information on Remote Sensing and Surveillance of Oil Spills,
contact Joseph Mullin at 703-787-1556 or via e-mail.
|
|
|