Minerals Management Service Minerals Management Service Search Topic Index About MMS What's New U.S. Department of the Interior
Environmental Program

Offshore Program

Environmental Program
Branch of Environmental Assessment
Branch of Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies Program
Oil Spill Modeling Program
Environmental Studies Program Information System
Social Science in MMS
Environment and Hydrates
Scientific Committee
spacer.gif (137 bytes)


Content questions?
Please write to the
contact listed at the
bottom of the page.

Technical questions?
Please Write:
OMM Web Team

This page last updated:
November 02, 2006

Environmental Studies

Industry Perspective

Environmental Studies Program Direction: Accelerated Deepwater Activities

Industry Perspective

Deepwater PlatformA good starting place to discuss deepwater operations is the Deep Star program, a joint industry effort involving eighteen companies begun in 1992 and now in its third phase. Through five committees, this program focuses on enabling development in the 3000 to 6000 ft range. Original emphasis upon seafloor systems tied back to shallower hosts has evolved to a larger number of options.

Deep development can be contrasted with shallow in four areas, drilling, production, processing and transportation.

  1. Drilling. Shallow development employs fixed platforms with drilling and control usually on the platform. In deeper water, these activities will migrate towards the bottom. The safety concerns are the same for shallow and deep. Modular Offshore Development Units (MODU’s) will increase in use.

  2. Production. Deep and shallow are actually quite similar with the former being a natural evolution of proven technologies from the latter. In production, workover, and abandonment, a major concern is keeping flow lines open. Subsea operations will see a shift in the location of hardware.

  3. Processing and Separation. Shallow and deep operations will be essentially the same.

  4. Transportation of Fluids. Deep operations may tie in to existing shallow pipeline systems connecting to existing infrastructure, thereby posing no new type of environmental risk. A newer technology under consideration for deep development is the use of tankers and floating production/storage and offloading facilities (FPO’s and FSO’s).

Any discussion of how deep water operations might impact the natural environment can begin with a comparison of existing shallow concerns and anticipated deep concerns. The physical disruption caused by deep drilling should be similar to shallow in the sense that such things as anchoring and bottom founded structures will cause change in the benthic environment. However, operation costs mandate that deep development proceed with a lower density of structures than now on the shelf.

Operational discharges may be fundamentally the same shallow and deep. Increased production rates in deep water will produce a greater produced water discharge, but one that will be comparable to or less than that now experienced in shallow water. Traditionally, shallow well drilling has depended heavily upon water based drilling fluids. Deep wells will depend more upon newer synthetic fluids, and it is expected that this same technology will be adopted at all depths. Multiple wells and horizontal wells in deep water can be expected to produce a greater volume of cuttings. However, against this scenario of some increased discharge are two offsetting factors. First, overall operations density should be less. Second, the dilution capacity of a deeper water column should minimize impact.

For more information, contact James Cimato.

Privacy | Disclaimers | Accessibility | Topic IndexFOIA