Minerals Management Service Minerals Management Service Search Topic Index About MMS What's New U.S. Department of the Interior
Environmental Program

Offshore Program

Environmental Program
Branch of Environmental Assessment
Branch of Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies Program
Oil Spill Modeling Program
Environmental Studies Program Information System
Social Science in MMS
Environment and Hydrates
Scientific Committee
spacer.gif (137 bytes)


Content questions?
Please write to the
contact listed at the
bottom of the page.

Technical questions?
Please Write:
OEMM Web Team

This page last updated:
July 14, 2008

Scientific Advisory Committee

Alaska Update

OCS Scientific Committee Meeting Summary - Alaska OCS Region Update

The Northstar Development and Production Plan submitted by BP Exploration Alaska was approved by the Alaska OCS Region last September. This is the first development plan approved by MMS in Alaska. The approval is limited to the drilling of wells into the Federal OCS from the Northstar Island which will be located in State of Alaska waters. The Northstar facility and the subsea pipeline are totally within State of Alaska lands and waters and most production will be from State leases. The pipeline will be the first buried in the seabed in an Arctic ice environment and has undergone much scrutiny by State and Federal agencies and the public.

Construction on Northstar started in the winter of 2000 with the first production expected sometime in 2001. Recoverable reserves are estimated at 158 million barrels of oil with peak daily production estimated at 65,000 barrels per day.

As part of the North Slope Oil Spill Contingency Plan, BP and Alaska Clean Seas recently conducted equipment demonstrations and deployment drills for their barge-based oil spill response tactics in broken ice.

Northstar has been undergoing a great deal of scrutiny from Federal and State agencies and the environmental community. Greenpeace has filed two lawsuits, one challenging the approval of the Northstar Development and Production Plan and one regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The MMS will continue to monitor the progress of these lawsuits. Also, the Alaska OCS Region has been responding to two additional FOIA requests regarding Northstar that are not part of lawsuits.

The Alaska OCS Region is also in the process of writing an EIS for BP’s Liberty Development and Production Plan for a facility on the Beaufort Sea OCS. The proposed Liberty Project is a man-made gravel island with a buried pipeline to bring production to shore. It is located about five miles offshore in Foggy Island Bay and 20 miles east of Prudhoe Bay. Onshore, the Liberty pipeline will connect to already constructed pipeline that transports oil from the onshore Badami Field located about 10 miles away. The prospect is expected to contain 120 million barrels of oil. If the proposed project is approved and stays on schedule, construction could begin in 2003 with first production planned for 2004.

Another issue for the Alaska OCS Region has been the topic of natural gas. The Region has been working on leasing and oil development issues for over 20 years. This year a new issue of gas development has become significant. Industry is considering a route for a natural gas pipeline from Prudhoe Bay, northward to about 4 miles offshore, eastward 300 miles, then southward along the Mackenzie River, and finishing at Calgary, Alberta. Most of the offshore portion would be on the U. S. OCS. (The other major alternatives are onshore.) Industry leaders have indicated they want to select a preferred route by the end of 2001. If the preferred route is on the OCS, the MMS would be responsible for issuing permits. A buried gas pipeline (as opposed to an oil pipeline) under the seafloor of the Beaufort Sea is a new issue. If the Beaufort OCS is the preferred route, the Alaska OCS Region may need to conduct environmental studies on a variety of environmental issues.

The MMS has worked and will continue to work with the environmental groups, the State, other Federal agencies, the North Slope Borough, and the Native villages on the activities in the central Beaufort Sea.

The MMS is pleased that the SC had the foresight to form a subcommittee that participated in the design and implementation of the Arctic Nearshore Impact Monitoring in Development Area (ANIMIDA) study and looks forward to benefiting from further input from the Arctic Monitoring Subcommittee in the design and implementation of more proposed studies.

For more information, contact Julie Reynolds.

 

Privacy | Disclaimers | Accessibility | Topic IndexFOIA