Minerals Management Service Minerals Management Service Search Topic Index About MMS What's New U.S. Department of the Interior
Environmental Program

Offshore Program

Environmental Program
Branch of Environmental Assessment
Branch of Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies Program
Oil Spill Modeling Program
Environmental Studies Program Information System
Social Science in MMS
Environment and Hydrates
Scientific Committee
spacer.gif (137 bytes)


Content questions?
Please write to the
contact listed at the
bottom of the page.

Technical questions?
Please Write:
OEMM Web Team

This page last updated:
July 14, 2008

Scientific Advisory Committee

Socioeconomics

OCS Scientific Committee

1999 Meeting Summary - Social and Economic Planning Conference Findings and Recommendations

Dr. Rodney Cluck, Sociologist, Environmental Studies Branch, reported that from August 24 through August 26, 1999, 60 social scientists and personnel of the MMS gathered in Park City, Utah, to discuss the Environmental Studies Program agenda for socioeconomic research. The task was to review past and ongoing research and identify the issues that were most pressing. The conference proceedings will be used to guide MMS social science in research, mitigation and decision making for Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas development. The conference supported the national and regional studies planning by defining linkages among study efforts conducted by MMS and developing logical long-term planning strategies at the regional and national levels.

Social and Economic Planning Conference Findings and Recommendations
Panel Members (left to right): Tim Holder, Claudia Rodgers, Harry Luton, Jim Lima, Rodney Cluck

Three members of the social science subcommittee (Lee Huskey of University of Alaska, Joanna Endter-Wada of Utah State University, and Stan Albrecht of Utah State University) offered their observations on the MMS socioeconomic studies program and the conference proceedings. Having served on the committee since the early nineties, they noted that higher-level agency support for socioeconomic research had increased considerably during the decade. They also commended the socioeconomic studies program for its responsiveness to changes in the oil industry, to the 1992 recommendations of the National Research Council, to political circumstances in the regions, and to the SC’s own recommendations.

This session considered the Social and Economic Planning Conference findings and recommendations as well as specific regional issues raised and what was learned as a result of the conference.

For more information, contact Julie Reynolds.

 

Privacy | Disclaimers | Accessibility | Topic IndexFOIA