|
| |


Contents of an EA
An EA shall contain, at a minimum, the sections prescribed by NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1508.9) and the Departmental Manual (516 DM 3.4).
Whenever possible, an EA shall tier upon other NEPA documents and incorporate by reference
discussions from NEPA documents, information provided by the lessee, technical papers, and
other documents available to the public.
EAs shall include the following information. Other formats may be used, but all
EAs must contain this information:
Title Page
 | Agency name (MMS Region). |
 | Document type (EA). |
 | Activity type (e.g. Exploration Plan). |
 | Location (e.g. De Soto Canyon, Block 467). |
 | Document date. |
 | Lessee/Operator name and lease number.
|
Description and Need for the Proposal *
 | For appropriate actions, the description may reference the OCS plan or permit
application.
|
Alternatives *
 | Alternatives proposed by the lessee/operator/applicant. |
 | Alternatives that consider other uses of those resources that involve unresolved
conflict (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(E)). |
 | Other alternatives or mitigation not part of the proposal that would minimize
environmental effects. |
Alternatives should be discussed in a comparative manner. For example, if an
alternative proposes adding operating conditions, discuss the rationale for imposing those
conditions and assess the changes in effects that would result if those conditions were
implemented.
Environmental impacts of the proposal and alternatives *
Describe the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on the offshore and onshore
environments expected to occur as a result of implementation of the proposal and
alternatives to the proposal. Concentrate on those impacts that could be significant
(40 CFR 1508.27). The analytical conclusions must clearly
identify the "significance" of potential effects. Relevant information
regarding environmental consequences obtained through consultation and review by
interested parties should also be included in this section.
Consultation and Coordination *
List the agencies and persons consulted regarding potential effects associated with the
proposal. This section will be used to identify controversial issues and any
substantive opposing or conflicting views raised by Federal, State, or local agencies or
the public regarding the level of environmental impact of the proposal. For example,
if a mitigation measure recommended by a reviewing party is not incorporated into one of
the alternatives because it is determined to be unreasonable, the basis for that
determination may be outlined in this section. If unresolved conflicts exist between
resource management agencies regarding the use of resources that would be affected by the
proposal (air, water, land, minerals, etc.), those conflicts should be discussed in this
section.
References Cited
* Required by CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.9 (b)).
EAs may also include the following information:
- Table of Contents.
- List of Tables and Figures.
- Introduction.
- List of Preparers.
- Appendices.
 | Reports - archaeological survey, biological survey, shallow hazards survey, etc. |
 | Pertinent correspondence (for example, agency comments, biological opinions, internal
MMS reviews, etc.). |
 | Oil Spill Risk Analysis. |
For more information, contact James F. Bennett.
|
|