|












Content:
Wilbon Rhome
Pagemasters:
OEMM Web Team

|
|
Discussions
with the Regions
The workgroup held a teleconference with all
three Regions on July 9, 1998, to discuss their thoughts and concerns about crane
accidents and regulations. Senior inspectors from each Gulf of Mexico Districts also
participated in the teleconference. Heres a summary of our discussion:
Thoughts and Concerns
 |
Human factors play a large role in crane accidents, the
root cause of many accidents is human error |
 |
Lack of experience can also be a factor, but serious
accidents can occur even with experienced personnel |
 |
Some of the cranes on platforms are in poor working
condition |
 |
Judgement of personnel involved in crane operations
(operator, riggers, ship captain, and facility manager) may be influenced by pressure to
get the job done |
Regulations
 |
API RP 2D is a good document. Our use of RP 2D is a good
example of performance based regulations. |
 |
Potential additions or shortcomings of API RP 2D -- further
define or specify minimum experience requirements for operators and riggers (we noted that
there is no mention of training for persons assisting the crane operator); clarify when
operator or inspector should take crane out of service; and discuss operating limits or
curtailment criteria for rough sea state or poor weather conditions |
 |
USCG regulations also use API RP 2D as the basis for their
operation and maintenance requirements. USCG goes a couple of steps further by requiring
the certification of cranes and third-party inspection and testing. |
 |
MMS should examine need for certification and third party
inspections |
 |
MMS needs to reexamine our PINC's to ensure that they
adequately cover API RP 2D |
 |
A good Safety and Environmental Management Plan should
cover crane operations and address the above shortcomings. |
Table of
Contents
Privacy |
Disclaimers |
Accessibility |
Topic Index | FOIA
Last Updated:
07/15/2008,
07:39 AM

|