
RESULTS OF THE
SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
ARCTIC MARGINS (ICAM-94)
(Magadan, Russia, September 6-10, 1994)
Introduction
Section 1: Stratigraphy and biostratigraphic
correlation.
Section 2: The Arctic Paleoclimates and
Paleogeography
Section 3: The Regional Correlation of Terranes
and Paleobasins
Section 4: Regional Geophysics, Lithosphere
Dynamics and Seismology
Section 5: Metallogeny and Mineral Resources of
Eastern Arctic
Section 6: Hydrocarbons
Section 7: Permafrost, Engineering Geology and
Mining Ecology
Round-table discussion: Present and Future
Cooperative Alliances Between Science, Industry and Government of Northern Countries
Field Trips
Summary
Introduction
The International Conference on Arctic Margins, ICAM-94, was held in
Magadan, northeastern Russia on September 6-10, 1994. This Conference was co-hosted by the
North East Science Center Far East Branch of the Russia Academy
of Sciences, and the Geophysical
Institute of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks.

North East Science Center, Far East Branch, Russian
Academy of Sciences
The ICAM-94 meeting was prepared and held at hard times for Russia. More
than 400 people expressed their wish to participate in this meeting, and more than 280
Abstracts were submitted and published. (Link to Proceedings)
In the course of the preparation for the ICAM-94, a number of papers were published
generalizing different problems of geology in northeastern Russia including the
stratigraphy of Triassic (Yu.M.Bychkov) and Cretaceous (V.P.Pokhialainen), the geology of
the Okhotsk-Chukchi Volcanic Belt (V.F.Belyi), alkalic volcanism (V.V.Akinin and
Yu.E.Apt), metallogeny (A.A.Sidorov et al.). A number of some other reviewing papers on
geology are also planned to be published. M.E.Gorodinsky prepared the English version of
the geologic guide for gold-mining enterprises in the Kolyma area, that is the so-called
"Golden Ring of Kolyma". The second English-Russian edition of the Directory for
the North East Science Center, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, and "The
Atlas of Multiple Gold and Silver Prediction Models for Northeastern Russia" were
issued for the ICAM-94 meeting.
Despite a large number of Abstracts submitted for the ICAM-94 meeting,
most of Russian scientists failed to attend this Conference due to very high prices for
air tickets. Unfortunately, all requests made by the ICAM-94 Organizing Committee to the
Russia Funds of Fundamental Studies, the Government of the Federation of Russia and the
Soros International Scientific Funds remained unfulfilled. The ICAM-94 meeting was
actually financed from the registration fees of the participants.
The ICAM-94 meeting took place the Northeast Interdisciplinary Research
Institute of the Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch. The scientific program of the
meeting and published Abstracts were distributed among the participants. Unfortunately,
the Proceedings of the previous International Conference on
Arctic Margins (to be distributed among the participants of the ICAM-94 and bags and
badges with the ICAM-94 symbols manufactured in Anchorage by a special order were not
delivered to Magadan by the beginning of the ICAM-94 meeting) were not delivered by Alaska
Airlines Company. As a result, the ICAM-94 Organizing Committee suffered finance losses
more than 2000 $ U.S.
For the ICAM-94 participants, there were 9 excursions to the Geologic
Museum of the Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute and "Golden Room"
of the Sevvostgeolkom Geologic Museum, 3 excursions to the Regional Museum of Local Nature
and History, and 3 bus excursions round the city. The field trip "Golden Ring of
Kolyma" was conducted on September 9-20, and its participants were 11 representatives
of mining industry of Canada, U.S., Australia and Japan.
Despite quite a difficult finance situation, the ICAM-94 meeting was
generally a success. More than 60 researchers and specialists from 12 Universities, 6
Federal Surveys and 10 gold-mining and oil companies from the U.S., Canada, England,
Australia, Germany, Netherlands, South Korea and Japan participated in the work of this
Conference.
The Russian side was represented at this Conference by more than 60
researchers from 10 Institute of the Russia Academy of Sciences, and the Yakutsk State
University, 6 industrial enterprises from Magadan, Yakutsk, Vladivostok, Khabarovsk,
Novosibirsk, Anadyr, Sankt-Peterburg, Moscow and Yuzno-Sakhalinsk.
In total, more than 130 people officially participated in the ICAM-94
meeting, representing 45 different organizations, and, besides them, more than 50 people
from different science, industrial and public organizations and private companies of
Magadan participated in the work of some sections, symposia and the round-table session.
The ICAM-94 meeting had 7 sections, 4 symposia and a round-table session.
The Marine Geology Section scheduled for the ICAM-94 was not held, as the marine
geologists, who plan to deliver their presentations at this section, didn't arrive in
Magadan. Both oral and poster presentations were made in all sections and symposia, that
were conducted at the same time. There were 103 oral and 43 poster presentations made at
the ICAM-94 meeting. The results of the work of the ICAM-94 sections and symposia can be
summarized as follows: [ Contents ]
Section 1: Stratigraphy and biostratigraphic
correlation.
Leader: Dr. V.P.Pokhialainen (Northeast Interdisciplinary
Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan), Scientific
Secretary: I.A.Rudakova (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute,
Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan).More than 30 reports were proposed
for this section, and there were 8 oral and 10 poster presentations of this number made at
this section. The presentations considered different aspects of Precambrian stratigraphy
and biostratigraphy in North America, the stratigraphy of Paleozoic and Triassic marine
rocks in northeastern Asia, different problems of palynostratigraphy of Cretaceous
deposits in northern Pacific and Canadian Arctic Archipelago and the results of sea
drilling in northern Atlantic. The participants of the discussion marked the original
character and a high scientific level of the made presentations.
Within this section there were two symposia held as follows:
1) "The Cretaceous Volcanic Belts of Arctic
Circumpacific". Leaders: Dr.V.F.Belyi (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan), Dr. T.K.Bundtzen (Geologic and Geophysical Survey of Alaska,
Fairbanks), Scientific Secretary: Dr. V.V.Akinin (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan). For this symposium , 8 reports were proposed for the presentation; three of
these reports were delivered and raised a significant interest of the audience, including
those participating in other sections and symposia. [ Contents
]
2) "The Late Cenozoic Basic and Ultrabasic Alkalic Volcanism
in Beringia Province." Leaders: Dr. V.F.Belyi
(Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch, Magadan), Dr. E.L.Moll-Stalcup (The U.S. Geological Survey,
Reston), Scientific Secretary: Dr. V.V.Akinin (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan). For this symposium, 10 reports were proposed for the presentation, and 7 of them
were delivered to the audience mostly interested in petrology and geochemistry of Late
Cenozoic alkalic volcanics. The discussion held at this symposium was mostly aimed at the
exchange of information between specialists directly involved in studies of Late Cenozoic
volcanism of the Bering Sea area. The American colleagues expressed their wish to conduct
joint studies of basaltoids of the Beringia Province together with the researchers from
the Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute of Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch (Magadan).
[ Contents ]
Section 2: The Arctic Paleoclimates and Paleogeography.
Leader: Dr. T.De-Freitas (Geologic Survey of Canada, Calgary),
Scientific Secretary: I.A.Rudakova (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research
Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan). For this section, 21
reports were proposed for the delivery, 5 of them were oral presentations and 1 poster
presentation. Such questions as the reconstruction and correlation of Early-to-Mid
Paleozoic and Cretaceous paleobasins in Arctic Canada, Alaska and Northeastern Russia were
under consideration. The poster presentation of a series of paleogeographic charts of
Arctic in Phanerozoic by J.Golonka was of a particular interest for the audience.
This section had a symposium devoted to New data obtained on the Beringia
history in Late Cenozoic. Leaders: Dr. P.Anderson (The
Washington State University, Seattle), Prof. D.M.Hopkins (The Alaska
State University, Fairbanks) and Dr. A.V.Lozhkin (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan), Scientific Secretary: Dr. O.Yu.Glushkova (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan).
For this symposium, 16 reports were proposed and 9 of them were delivered to the
audience. These presentations were devoted to the three main problems of the Beringia
paleogeography in Late Cenozoic, that is: 1) the changes in Arctic marginal areas; 2)
glaciation and interstadials; 3) the Beringia paleoecology in Late Cenozoic. The most
interesting were the data presented on the Pinakul suite in Eastern Chukotka, that
includes the deposits of the last interstadial having the age 125,000 years by amino
acids, also the information about the use of the space radar to determine
non-contemporaneous moraine occurrences, new data on palynologic and carbon datings of
changes in vegetation and climate in the Elgygytgyn Lake area in northeastern Chukotka,
and the results of palynologic and carbon dating analyzes of lake deposits in southern
Chukotka and the Kolyma River upper run area. During the work of this symposium, there was
a lively discussion of the model for an extensive glaciation of the Eurasia arctic areas
in Pleistocene proposed by Dr.M.Grossvald.
Section 3: The Regional Correlation of Terranes and
Paleobasins.
Leaders: Dr. S.G.Byalobzhesky (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research
Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan), Dr. L.S.Lane
(Geologic Survey of Canada, Calgary), Dr.W.L.Nokleberg (U.S. Geological
Survey, Menlo Park),Prof.L.M.Parfenov (The Institute of Geological
Science, Russia Academy of Science Siberian Branch, Yakutsk), Scientific Secretary: V.B.Likman
(Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch, Magadan). For this section, 36 scientific reports were proposed, and there were 14
oral presentations and 6 poster presentations.
The reports of a particular interest for the audience were "The Correlation of
Major Terranes and Overlapping Complexes" by W.J.Nokleberg and co-authors from U.S.,
Canada and Russia, "The Correlation Round the Canadian Arctic Basin" by L.S.Lane
and co-authors from Canada and Russia, "Differentiation of the Northern
Circumpacific: Variations in Tectonic Style and Plate Tectonic Results" by E.L.Miller
and co-authors, "The Most Important Problems of Tectonics in Northeastern Asia"
by L.M.Parfenov and K.Fujita (U.S.), "The Formation of the Taimyr Folded Area during
Riphean and Paleozoic" by V.A.Vernikovsky, and "The Tectonics and Geodynamics of
the Southern Koryak Highlands and Kamchatka" by V.P.Zinkevich and N.V.Tsukanov.
These presentations and discussions provided for a better understanding by the audience
of the regional tectonics of the vast eastern Arctic and northern Pacific folded rim and
served as a basis to outline cooperative studies in future.
This section had a symposium on mantle gneiss domes, core metamorphic complexes
and granite metamorphic domes. Leaders: Dr. M.L.Gelman (Northeast
Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch,
Magadan), Dr. E.L.Miller (Stanford University, Stanford), Scientific
Secretary: Dr. A.V.Trushnin (Northeastern Research Center of Mineral
Row). For this symposium, 12 reports were submitted, and 7 of them were presented to the
audience.
The review presentations made by E.L.Miller (with co-authors) and M.L.Gelman hold that
the granite metamorphic domes of Paleozoic and Late Cenozoic in northeastern Siberia have
similar structures but differ for the duration of their geologic development. In the
Omolon median mass, the development of domes as areas of a relative upwarping and
volcanism centers, and the distribution of plutons and metamorphic zones proceeded since
Late Proterozoic to Permian; these events were a prolonged transformation of the Earth's
crust of Archean to Early Proterozoic ages and were similar to the granite series in
western Europe. The geologic history of Late Mesozoic domes was much shorter, i.e. since
Oxfordian till mid-Early Cretaceous, and the main regional metamorphism event was
particularly short in their cores. Cretaceous domes in Alaska and North American
Cordillera also have a short-term history of their formation and upwarping to the erosion
surface level. Late Mesozoic domes are a particular phenomenon in the transformation
history of the Earth's crust of continental blocks in the Prepacific rim. Tension-related
tectonic environment is shown as the determinative factor for dome formation. The
information available serves as a basis to make these general conclusions and specify the
advantages of different methodologies, that is the historical geologic and petrologic
methods mostly used in northeastern Russia and the structural geologic method with a
consistent use of isotope geochemistry and geochronology methods preferred by American
researchers.
The discussion of the presentations made at this symposium was lively and fruitful. The
results of studies already performed will be also important for the continuation of joint
Russian-American investigations of the Earth's crust evolution on the Bering Sea and
Chukchi Sea offshore areas under a large project, in which some of the participants of the
symposium are involved. [ Contents ]
Section 4: Regional Geophysics, Lithosphere Dynamics and
Seismology.
Leaders: Dr. Yu.Ya.Vaschilov (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research
Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan), Dr. L.I.Izmailov
(Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch, Magadan), Dr. B.V.Kozmin (The Institute of Geological Science,
Russia Academy of Science Siberian Branch, Yakutsk), Prof. K.Fujita
(Geological Institute of the Alaska State University, Fairbanks), Scientific Secretary: V.V.Lyubomudrov
(Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch, Magadan). For this section, 32 reports were submitted including 11 oral and 1
poster presentation. The reports were on three major problems as follows: 1) gravity and
subduction; 2) deep structures; 3) paleomagnetism and geochronology.
Most of these reports contained a new information on different facets of geophysical
studies in northeastern Russia and also demonstrated a non-trivial approach to solve these
problems. The only report on the northern Pacific and its Euro-American continental rim
was by Yu.V.Chudinov. The most interesting reports included those on the geologic and
geophysical properties of the Laptev Sea bottom and coastal areas by B.V.Kozmin and
K.Fujita with co-authors, seismic collapses by B.P.Vazhenin, etc.
The foreign participants presented new or reinterpreted data on the structure and
tectonics of northeastern Russia; these greatly improved or called into some question
earlier conclusions. The reinterpretations were based on more quantitative methods than
used previously and show great potential in both seismic and gravimetric studies, both of
the crust and the deep structure beneath the Sea of Okhotsk. For example, Okal relocated
all historical seismicity to identify a seismically active zone beneath Sakhalin which was
not detached from the rest of the subducting slab. This presentation on the modern
Benioff-Vadati zone of the Kurils-Kamchatka island arc aroused a significant interest of
the audience, but also demonstrated that the authors were unaware of results of many
different studies conducted by Russian researchers with respect to this problem. Mackey
relocated epicenters in the Magadan region and then inverted the data to simultaneously
obtain seismic velocities and crustal structure, eliminating effects of mislocations and
systematic timing errors. Norton used gravity data from the Verkhoyansk-Kolyma Mesozoides
to make refined crustal models. New data, using new or improved methods were used to
identify a magnetic overprint which calls some paleomagnetic pole determinations in the
Chersky Range into question (Stone), or provided a much more detailed geochronology of the
formation of the granites in the Kolyma granitic belt (Layer). [
Contents ]
Section 5: Metallogeny and Mineral Resources of Eastern
Arctic.
Leaders: Dr. K.Dawson (The Geological Survey of Canada, Vancouver),
Acad. A.A.Sidorov (Northeast Research Center, Russia Academy of Sciences
Far East Branch, Magadan), Scientific Secretary: Dr. N.A.Goryachev
(Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia Academy of Sciences Far East
Branch, Magadan). For this section, 39 reports were submitted including 12 oral
presentations at the plenary session and 14 poster presentations. These presentations
considered the problems of metallogeny and reserves of platinoids (4 reports), gold (6
reports), silver (5 reports), also general metallogeny of the northern Circumpacific (9
reports) and throughout the world (1 report). There was also the presentation made by
M.D.Balen on the Alaska mineral industry cost escalation factors. The presentations were
made at a high scientific and professional level and are important to understand the
regularities of distribution of mineral deposits and occurrences on the basis of new plate
tectonic conceptions.
The main result of the work under this section was the discussion of the joint project,
that will be finished soon, on the compilation of the Northern Circumpacific Metallogenic
Map, Scale 1:5,000,000, with the involvement of specialists from Russia, U.S. and Canada.
In reports made by W.Nokleberg with co-authors, A.A.Sidorov with co-authors, K.Dawson with
co-authors, V.V.Ratkin with co-authors and T.Bundtzen with co-authors, the principles and
methods used to compile such maps were considered and descriptions of metallogenic belts
throughout Russia, Canada and U.S. were given. This metallogenic project is the first
cooperative study, that demonstrates many advantages of using a single research approach
to examine the geologic structural environment and synthesis the regularities of minerals
distribution throughout a vast territory consisting of regions with different formational
history. The first portion of these materials was already published in U.S. and is in a
great demand now, as it is the first English summary of geology and metallogeny of not
only Alaska and Canada but also northeastern Russia, and the latter is the area actually
unknown for our foreign colleagues. The second portion of these materials is also planned
to be published. The prospects for the like metallogenic studies in Siberia and northern
Mongolia were discussed at this section.
The rest of the reports were on specific but still important questions of metallogeny
of platinoids in platiniferous districts (presentations by J.Foley and L.Bottomer) and in
auriferous districts in shales (presentation by A.A.Sidorov and co-authors). Presentations
made by A.A.Sidorov, G.N.Gamyanin, N.A.Goryachev, Yu.V.Chudinov, M.Z.Zinnatullin with
co-authors, included regional generalizations and comparisons and considered the
occurrence of mineral deposits in geologic structures with respect to their forming
processes.
The questions of mineralogy of gold and silver deposits were thoroughly examined in
reports made by N.E.Savva, A.A.Plyashkevich, S.F.Petrov, E.E.Tyukova with co-authors. Some
presentations including those by K.Dawson, S.S.Yudin and V.I.Shpikerman were devoted to
general problems of metallogeny. V.I.Shpikerman put forward in his report the idea to
distinguish the Circumalazeya metallogenic belt as a new metallogenic structure in
northeastern Russia. [ Contents ]
Section 6: Hydrocarbons.
Leaders: Dr. M.Ibrahim (Minerals Management Service, Herndon, U.S.),
Dr. O.V.Scherban (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia
Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan). For this section, 19 reports were
submitted, and 6 of them were delivered as oral presentations. Presentations made by
D.V.Lazurkin with co-authors on oil-and-gas areas in Arctic, and K.Sherwood on hydrocarbon
potential of the Chukchi Sea shelf became of the most interest for the audience.
[ Contents ]
Section 7: Permafrost, Engineering Geology and Mining Ecology.
Leaders: D.Carter (U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage), Dr.P.Kourfurst
(The Natural Resources Service of Canada, Ottawa), Dr.G.Z.Perlshtein
(Institute of Permafrost, Magadan), Scientific Secretary: T.V.Bantsekina
(Institute of Permafrost, Magadan). For this section, 39 reports were submitted, and 14 of
them were delivered as oral presentations at the plenary session and 8 as poster
presentations. The submitted reports dealt with four major problems as follows: 1) general
regularities of formation of frozen rocks; 2) the engineering problems of industrial
development in permafrost areas; 3) the environmental impact from industrial development
in cryolithic zone areas; 4) geophysical prospecting of frozen rocks.
The materials presented at this section were appreciated by the participants of the
open discussion as being original and high-professional, and having a high scientific and
applied significance. The method of computer modeling of heat exchange processes usually
used in permafrost science to reconstruct paleoclimates of Pleistocene attracted a
particular interest of the audience. Also, the presentation made by V.A.Basisty and
A.A.Buyskin on the thickness of frozen rocks as related to the character of the
sedimentation and neotectonic movements was of a general interest for the audience. During
these discussions, the participants said their proposals on the development of cooperative
Russian-American studies. [ Contents ]
Round-table discussion: Present and Future Cooperative
Alliances Between Science, Industry and Government of Northern Countries.
Leaders: W.Rosenbucsh, the Assistant Secretary of the Interior
(U.S.Department of the Interior, Washington) and Dr. O.V.Scherban, the
President of the Northeast Petroleum Operating Agency (Magadan). The round-table
discussion was about the "Joint Call for Nomination and Comments for the Proposed
Simultaneous Lease Sale of the U.S. Chukchi Sea and Hope Basin Tracts and the Adjacent
Russian Northern and Southern Chukchi Tracts", that was published in the American and
Russian press by the Minerals Management Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior
and the Federation of Russia Committee on Geology and Mineral Resources. The participants
in this discussion were representatives of the U.S. Department of the Interior, the
Government of the Magadan Region and Chukchi Autonomous Area, the Federation of Russia
Committee on Geology and Mineral Resources, Russia Academy of Sciences, environmental
organizations from Magadan and Magadan Region, Russian and foreign oil companies, public
and press. The questions considered by the participants during this round-table discussion
included those of the offshore areas offered for the lease sale with respect to the
Russia-U.S. boundary, environmental protection, as for instance, rare and endangered
species, providing for the safety of exploration drilling operations and so on. This
round-table meeting was actually the first public discussion, held in Russia, of the
proposed project of hydrocarbons development in the Russia Far East offshore. [ Contents ]
Field Trips
According to the ICAM-94 schedule, there were two geologic field trips
organized for the ICAM-94 participants.
A one-day field trip to the Magadan gabbro-granite pluton. Leader: Dr.
M.L.Gelman (Northeast Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Russia
Academy of Sciences Far East Branch, Magadan). This field trip was on September 8 and 9, 4
to 8 p.m. The participants were 10 scientists from U.S., Canada, Japan and Russia.
The Magadan rock mass represents a complex history of Late
Mesozoic, i.e. Late Jurassic to Mid-Cretaceous, magmatism in northeastern Siberia and is
considered to be standard. The participants familiarized themselves with
non-contemporaneous plutonic rocks having contacts inside this rock mass and revealing
numerous intrusion phases. The visitors became much interested in outcrops of a
granite-hosted mafic synplutonic dike, mixed tuff with felsic pyroclasts in felsic matrix
and, vice versa, with mafic pyroclasts in felsic matrix illustrating the magma mixing
during intrusive and volcanic processes. The participants also saw different volcanic
metamorphism events and non-commercial occurrences of copper mineralization of porphyry
type characteristic of the OCVB interior. Their attention was also drawn to how
rift-related processes of Miocene influenced granitoids of the Magadan rock mass. The
participants of this field trip discussed different questions of the geology and
petrography of this rock mass, that is similar to the Sierra-Nevada and other batholiths
of the North American Cordillera.
"The Golden Ring of Kolyma" field trip took place on
September 9-20. Leader: Dr. M.E.Gorodinsky. The participants were 11
specialists from U.S., Canada, Australia and Japan.
The participants visited different gold and gold-silver lode deposits including the
Dukat, Natalka, Uschelny, Karamken and others, and gold placer deposits including the
Debin, Chai-Yurya, Orotukan and other deposits; they also familiarized themselves with
Permian and Early-to-Mid Jurassic sedimentary sequences of the Verkhnoyan complex and
Cretaceous volcanic-sedimentary sequences, that make up the Okhotsk-Chukchi Volcanic Belt.
In addition to the schedule of this field trip, the participants also visited the Lunnoe
and Nadezhda mineral deposits, some gold lodes and tin occurrences. They also had the
opportunity to visit the former Butugychag labour camp of the GULAG, the Talaya spa and
the Kolyma hydro-electric plant. In Magadan, they visited the Museum of Local History and
Nature and geological museums. [ Contents ]
Summary
The results of the ICAM-94 meeting can be summarized as follows.
In general, the ICAM-94 meeting was a success despite certain financial and
organizational problems and difficulties mentioned above. The main results of this
Conference include, first, the establishment of professional contacts between specialists
from many countries, primarily Russia, U.S., Canada and Japan. Second, the results
obtained under come international joint projects with the involvement of researchers from
Russia, U.S. and Canada, that embrace a broad spectrum of the Arctic geology ranging from
paleogeographic and paleoclimatic reconstructions to the tectono-metallogenic
generalization actually covering the entire northern Circumpacific, were the first time
delivered at this Conference. Third, it was the first time in the history of Russia that a
public discussion of a simultaneous lease sale proposed for the Chukchi Sea offshore was
held, with the involvement of scientists, people from industry and Russia and U.S.
governments, and representatives of the interested foreign oil companies including the
Mobil, Texaco, Shell and others, Russian business circles, public and press. [ Contents ]
K.V.Simakov
Chairman ICAM-94 Organizing Committee,
Corresponding Member of the Russia Academy of Sciences.
For More Information Contact:
Dennis Thurston
Minerals Management Service
3801 Centerpoint Drive, Suite 500
Anchorage, Alaska 99503 |
Phone: (907) 334-5338
Fax: (907) 334-5322
Email: dennis.thurston@mms.gov |
Professor David B. Stone
Geophysical Institute
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-0800 |
phone: (907) 474-7622
fax: (907) 474-7290
Email: dstone@gi.alaska.edu |
|
|
 |
| Special thanks to MMS for hosting this web site |
Content:
Dennis Thurston
Last Updated
01/11/2006 |
|